Page 3 The Sun Bay Paper April 15, 2026 The FBI I Knew — cont’d. Cont. from pg. 2 those Democraps is to get Magistrate arrest warrants and Search warrants for documents that show evidence of guilt, computers, etc. Arrest the bastards, cuff them. I wrote to you that we should NOT go to the Grand Jury. You do NOT want to go to a preliminary hearing. If my memory serves me correctly, the procedure a good AUSA and Agent want is a Magistrate Warrant to arrest and search, and then request an Information filed by prosecutor by passing the Grand Jury. The case Agent presents and eliminates the preliminary hearing…hearsay testimony is allowed! No evidence unless it’s for PC…that’s all that is necessary! If we would have disclosed what evidence we found …before 3500 material is provided to the defense, we would have been fired! It compromises the case …no early releases to scoundrels…wait until trial! Then and only then … required by law, at trial …stop the transparency BULLSHIT, follow the damn laws and to hell with politics when it comes to criminals, crimes and evidence! They broke the laws …not us…they deserve what the law provides …nothing more and nothing less …go by that rule and you will stay out of trouble! If you indict and get a Bench warrant, you will NEVER solve shit! The idea, geniuses, is to “get the subject’s side”, wink…wink…get it… or are you (whoever decided to indict Comey) …just plain dumb? How’d that go? What did he have to say? Once you indict you won’t get to first base with the Subject …you won’t even get to talk to him/her!! You see …subject interviews are the most important part of a good, smart Agent …but none of you know that because YOU DON’T DO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS! The idea is to work the interviews, so you get them thinking …the young ones, who were led around by the nose (like Huma), do NOT want felony convictions on their resume! Comey is a wimp. Without lawyers following him around, he would have rolled completely over… too late now! You need help. Look how fast he rolled on admitting the “Steele Dossier is seditious and unverified” …President Trump got a confession by “interviewing” Comey and Comey is too dumb to realize it! President Trump was so surprised, he didn’t know what to say next BUT he got the most IMPORTANT part of that interview …Comey signed the Affidavits for the search warrants and KNEW it was a FRAUD! A good question would have been, “Then why did you and the others sign the warrants”?! Director Hoover became Director and started firing do nothing Agents and replaced them with college educated candidates …with fighting skills as well, and it worked! Times have changed and we need “that” and not less …more …go after former, military trained … SOG, Seals, Delta, Rangers …tough, well trained, smart …just teach them the laws! They already know how to shoot and fight, just teach them the laws and give them the Criminal Violations that they must have to stay sharp! Interviewing arrested Criminals is as valuable to developing informants and solving cases and dealing with the public! For 25 years, the FBI has lost those skills … gone! Many Agents do not carry their guns … that was a mistake that got an Agent fired! They don’t work CRIMINAL CASES so how the hell are they going to learn the …How To?! That is critical to making a good investigator… a great investigator! The biggest, BEST, violations to get sharp and stay sharp are Fugitives and Bank Robberies…those are “MUST HAVES”. J. Gary DiLaura, FBI RET Owner, SBP Media LLC therightsidejgarydilaura.com Elitist 'Public' Broadcasting Defines 'Viewpoint Discrimination' The newspapers routinely play Hide the Ideology when liberal judges are resisting President Donald Trump. They'll write "a federal judge" ruled against Trump and not tell consumers that the judge is a liberal. Liberals are always painted as nonpartisans when they act like partisans. That's the case with Obama-appointed judge (and former Clinton Justice Department attorney) Randolph Moss, who mysteriously found it was a violation of the First Amendment and "viewpoint discrimination" for Trump to push defunding of PBS and NPR in an executive order. "The message is clear: NPR and PBS need not apply for any federal benefit because the President disapproves of their 'left-wing' coverage of the news," wrote the partisan judge. The First Amendment "does not tolerate viewpoint discrimination and retaliation of this type." They loved this ruling at NPR. "Today's ruling is a decisive affirmation of the rights of a free and independent press," Black Lives Matter-loving NPR CEO Katherine Maher said in a statement. An "independent press" isn't defined by taking government money. That makes you a dependent press. Then Maher unleashed her typical insincerity: "Public media exists to serve the public interest -- that of Americans -- not that of any political agenda or elected official." Everyone listening to NPR knows that's a pants-on-fire lie. NPR whistleblower Uri Berliner found in D.C. voter records that the NPR newsroom had 87 registered Democrats and no registered Republicans. PBS said in a statement that the judge's ruling affirmed that Trump imposed "textbook unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and retaliation, in violation of longstanding First Amendment principles." Where on Earth in the First Amendment is the part about how conservatives should have to support government-funded viewpoint discrimination and retaliation? PBS and NPR have been discriminating against conservatives and Republicans since the Nixon years. That's why the phrase "public broadcasting" is ludicrous. They have no interest in representing the entire public. They are broadcasting by the Left, for the Left. They're like taxpayer-funded MS NOW. There's no reason for taxpayers to support that. When we've studied guest counts, the tilt is obvious. In the first four months of Trump's second term, we found the "PBS News Hour" guest count was 173 liberals to 41 conservatives -- a ratio of 4.2 to 1. When elected officials and political appointees were removed from the count, the ideological tilt was 149 to 23, or 6.5 to 1. That's actually much better than NPR's ludicrously titled "All Things Considered" evening newscast. In the two months after Congress rescinded their funding -- from July 19 to Sept. 18, 2025 -- the guest count was 53 liberals to three conservatives, and one of those three was opposed to Trump. That's almost 18 to 1. Nobody at NPR believes in what they call "false balance." They believe in rhetorically shoving conservatives to the ground and roughing them up. After all the bullying, they steal their lunch money. These people have the audacity to claim they're on the wrong side of "viewpoint discrimination." It's the same way that liberals insist you can't object to "The View" having a guest disparity of 128 to 2, or latenight comedians favoring liberal guests 99% of the time (as per our 2025 counts). At least these shows didn't take conservative money and bash them over the head with it. Luckily, Congress rescinded the subsidies for PBS and NPR (for now), and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting shut down their propaganda-backing shop. But as soon as Democrats get back control of Congress, they'll start trying to subsidize it all over again. Why wouldn't Democrats want to fund DNC Media? That's why the entire "public broadcasting" concept is an enormous fraud. Tim Graham Director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and Executive Editor of the blog NewsBusters.org
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjA2ODE3