June 7, 2024 The Sun Bay Paper Page 8 I believe James Comey knew that to become a Criminal investigator, FBI Agents must investigate CRIME, violent crime, make arrests, draw up search warrants execute/serve search warrants. They must perform all the aspects of crime fighting. After all, which made the FBI great… Fighting Crime! Working on Title 3 (wiretaps), doing surveillance, performing raids and dangerous arrests, dealing with the public, a very, very important part of becoming an FBI Agent, developing informants… all aspects of Crime Fighting …that do NOT exist if you do not work “Criminal Cases,” which the FBI NO LONGER DOES and hasn’t for the past 20 plus years! Hunter-Gatherer of Intelligence does not an FBI Agent, make…sorry, guys. That is a big part of how/ why the FBI buffoons used SWAT teams and CNN TV Cameras on the searches of Popadopalis house, Roger Stone’s house, and President Trump’s house. That’s also why they screwed up the investigation of Trump’s home… unauthorized and illegal, in my opinion! I taught SWAT and was on the SWAT Team for years. Those search warrants would be good training films on how NOT to utilize our SWAT resources… heavy-handed, threatening, without reason(unreasonable…read the 4th Amendment) to believe there was a threat! HOW NOT TO USE SWAT! Comey redirected the control of handling cases from the field offices to Hq in several ways. For example, he directed that phone calls be routed to FBI Headquarters. He replaced live field office personnel, both Agents and Clerical, with a tape recording to call 911 if it’s an emergency…for real! In my opinion, he did that to sever the public / Agent contact, which was the FBI’s MOST IMPORTANT crime-fighting tool …he pushed the public away from dealing directly with Agents taking complaints from Citizens on Crimes Fighting because he wanted more control over what the FBI did! I think he didn’t wish for Agents dealing with the public and developing informants. To develop sources/ informants, you must create a skill to do so, and it takes time to develop those skills…Hunter Gatherer doesn’t do it! As Criminal Agents, we were REQUIRED to have at least three sources…if we didn’t, we were disciplined, which cost us promotions, raises, and money to support a family! So, we made it a point to get good at it! It seems like Comey did not want the FBI to solve crimes that he didn’t wish to be solved… like political cases… at least, it sure looks like that? For example… Hillary Clinton… Comey made FBI Headquarters the “Office of Origin” (OO) on the Clinton case. FBI HQ does not have an investigative staff, has no secure Evidence facility, and does not have the experience it takes to conduct an investigation…look at the unacceptable errors made by Comey’s team, lying, leaking, then lying about leaking, tampering with evidence, screwing up interviews…buffoons of the week award winning people! Well, up to that point in modern history, ALL criminal cases were handled by the Field Offices, NEVER by Hq, at least not until Comey! Field Offices were the Boss except in Presidential Appointments and Applicant Background investigations, never criminal cases… except Hillary Clinton!? Hq has none of the above, and the proof of that is in McCabe’s storage (hiding) of critical evidence in his desk for six months! Agents have been fired and charged criminally for Obstruction of Justice, Evidence tampering! Those are Felonies! No lawman can store (hide) evidence for six months, unrecorded…there must be a Chain of Custody, by law! What do you think, folks? Would McCabe put very damning evidence on Hillary’s case or Hunter’s case in his freaking desk by accident… or… to hide incriminating evidence? Would Hillary accidentally destroy 34,000 documents “that were under subpoena”? If somebody did that in one of my cases, as soon as I learned of that, I would have arrested them! If you believe “to hide it,” for any reason whatsoever… is a reason to be fired and a chargeable offense, an offense of tampering with evidence, as well as Obstruction of Justice…plain and simple…then why wasn’t McCabe fired or Hillary prosecuted? Answer…Comey! Maybe it was because Comey needed him to leak information to the press, which McCabe admitted he did! McCabe said, under oath, and testified that Comey directed him to leak to the Washington Post! What did Comey say when asked, “Did you ever ask anyone to leak information” Comey replied, “NO”. Both cannot be telling the truth. These were the top two executives in the FBI! Who knows how many times Comey’s buddies did that…I’d bet it’s more than once! Simply put, the ONLY reason Comey did what he did in the Clinton case is what I alleged. Comey put two buffoons on her case, McCabe and Strzok, either to sabotage the case by violating almost every Rule in the FBI Handbook intentionally or Comey knew those two would screw up the interview. Comey did all he could to get Clinton off the hook, and he succeeded? HE “sabotaged” that case and didn’t care who he threw under the bus …it was for his best friends. After all, Bill appointed him USA! All FBI Criminal cases have either a subject’s name in the title or UNSUB(s)…either a known subject or its unknown who the subject is. What do you think…was it known, at that time, who the subject of the Hillary Clinton investigation is/ was? It was well known she created her own server, used her cell phone and Blackberry for State communications, and worst of all, after being subpoenaed after she stole 34,000 State Department Documents, Classified or not, she took 34,000 of GOVERNMENT OWNED property that was under subpoena and destroyed all of it… nothing else matters! My guess is …yes…the Subject of her case was her, HILLARY CLINTON! You can bet your ass that Hillary was the subject of her own case, and Comey obstructed the investigation by either doing that or authorizing that simple but essential act of obstruction…it changed the FBI Rules …to help the worst female criminal this country has ever known, off the hook, my opinion! The reason Comey took the subject’s name (Hillary) out of the Title could be several. First, the FBI Rules change handling the case and the investigation elements. If she were a witness, then there probably is no reason to tell her her 5th Amendment rights. Suppose she’s a subject… a good chance you MUST say to her the 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Then there is the “appearance to the public about being a “Witness” in an FBI Case or the Subject in the case. AND Hillary can stand up in public, as she so humbly did, on TV and do her Clinton “act,” “I am NOT the subject of an FBI investigation”! If she’s the Subject, then NO lawyers can be present… Hillary had +/- 5 lawyers and a witness, Huma Abedin, present! Good work, Strzok! In the old FBI, in a case like Hillary’s, only the Director could do that. Who else could … allow Strzok to interview her with a cast of lawyers present…nobody else has the authority but the Director to do such a stupid thing…then it raises the excellent question of WHY! Why would somebody like the FBI Director allow something as dumb as that if they were on the side of law enforcement!? How could I know that? Hillary has a signed contract with the DNC that she paid off their debt and, in return, took complete charge of all the DNC finances, amongst other duties, and had to approve ALL spending?! Then there’s the fact she was Secretary of State and signed a very specific NDA about protecting Secret stuff and did she have training (yes, signed she), … the NDA…no disclosures, no destruction, no copying, and no takehome stuff…it’s there …all Strzok had to do was show her where she signed! Did he? Did he show her where she signed? NOT!!!??? Why the hell NOT…Agent Strzok??? If Strzok did, he should have stopped, told her her rights, and asked again, “Did you have any training on classified material.” Then Comey explained some, but not all, of the crimes Hillary DID commit by using her servers for official State Department communications, stealing and then destroying official, sometimes a top secret or SOP documents, paying Fusion GPS to create a phony Dossier of Trump, Colluding with Russia and on and on BUT…He would not prosecute Hillary! JIMBO… IT’S NOT YOUR CHOICE!!! Here’s the biggest problem with that decision, Mr. Comey…since when does the FBI decide whether or not to prosecute? When Comey was a US Attorney, if an FBI Director said, “I decline prosecution,” what would YOU have to say about that? The FBI’s stated mission at all times is/was IS JAMES COMEY, A LIAR, A FELON, AND MORE…? Cont. on pg 9 Cont. from pg 7
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjA2ODE3